Amplify
Enjoy the conversation.
Amplify is a place to talk about what's going on.
It's as simple as that.
   

Hillel Glazer | My Amplify

Things I Amplify from the web

More feedback from the blogosphere on #CMMI from #Agile2010

The sentiment is fairly close, though Kent may have been misquoted or just uncareful with his choice of words. CMMI dictates *goals* and infers that they include engineering and process quality metrics and improvement. CMMI doesn't actually dictate any metrics or that any specific thing improve.

Amplifyd from scrumerati.com
CMMI+Scrum continues to intrigue, as it demands that the organization find ways to measure and improve enterprise-wide processes, potentially complimenting Scrum's feedback loops and retrospectives at the team level. However, almost all CMMI books provide examples exclusively from waterfall. Many people talked about needing an enterprise capability model  like CMMI that better reflected Agile thinking. Finally, Kent Johnson made a great comment that put it together for me: “CMMI dictates engineering and process quality metrics and improvement, but the real goal is value.”Read more at scrumerati.com
 

1 Comment

  1. Mike Dwyer  If you use Stacey’s complexity graph as a base, CMMI is the second half of the solution as it sits firmly on the axis working on agreement as to how to deliver the value business wants. Your comments clarify the need for CMMI to not muddle the drive to simplicity by engaging in determining business working to clarify the value they want delivered.